Remove Commercial Remove Market Remove Price Remove Tanzania
article thumbnail

Magnis signs offtake agreement with Tesla for anode active materials; N. American production

Green Car Congress

Australia-based Magnis Energy Technologies has entered into a binding offtake agreement with Tesla for the supply of anode active materials (AAM) beginning in February 2025 with fixed pricing. The company is in the process of selecting a United States location for the AAM facility. Earlier post.)

Tanzania 397
article thumbnail

Tesla inks deal with Magnis Energy for three-year graphite deal

Teslarati

Magnis announced on Tuesday (via Sawyer Merritt ) that it would begin supplying Tesla with a minimum of 17,500 tonnes per annum of AAM for a minimum term of three years at a fixed price. A pilot plant must produce AAM by March 31, 2024, and commercial production must commence by February 1, 2025.

Energy 98
article thumbnail

Once More: Can Bajaj Auto repeat its CNG success? | Autocar Professional

Baua Electric

Fast expanding CNG retail amplifying demand At a time when OEMs are competing with each other to announce their plans for the EV market, Bajaj Auto’s announcement of a CNG bike certainly stands out. Domestic gas prices are now pegged at 10% of the monthly average for India’s crude basket, offering greater stability.

Auto 52
article thumbnail

A closer look at graphite—its forms, functions and future in EV batteries

Charged EVs

Because most of the vehicle cost is in the battery, as we all know, so it depends if it’s a high-end vehicle versus a more moderately priced vehicle—that will affect battery chemistry and other components as well. That’s not currently what the market really wants. So the mix of graphite varies by manufacturer, by car model, etc.

Future 113
article thumbnail

Perspective: Why Carbon Emissions Should Not Have Been the Focus of the UN Climate Change Summit and Why the 15th Conference of the Parties Should Have Focused on Technology Transfer

Green Car Congress

Post Bali, two approaches to Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) have been articulated: Cuba, India, Tanzania, Indonesia, China and others argue that IPRs needs to be addressed as a barrier within the technology transfer discussion; Australia and the US argue that IPRs is a catalyst, rather than a barrier, to technology transfer.