This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In the interim, we need a large, focused, federalprogram to develop and demonstrate commercial-scale technologies. We urgently need technology options for these plants and policies that incentivize implementation. We may not see a strong CO 2 price signal for many years.
According to 2013 studies on well-to-wheel greenhouse-gas emissions (GHG) by the Advanced Power and Energy Program at the University of California, Irvine, hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles have the lowest overall emission levels of all alternativefuel entries.
While staff has worked with USEPA in an effort to align many of the requirements of the two programs, some elements of the proposed LEV III program are expected to remain more stringent than the federalprogram in order to address California’s unique air pollution problems.
Using the US Department of Energy’s alternativefuel locator , we can see the US has (as of this writing): 129,598 publicly available EV charging ports spread over 50,401 public charging stations. The AlternativeFuel Infrastructure Tax Credit provides eligible businesses with a tax credit up to 30% of the cost of equipment.
However, it is restricted by census tract. NEVI provides funding for banks of at least four DCFCs every 50 miles along alternativefuel corridors, no further than 1 mile from the highway exit. There are also funding programs in each state, which businesses can learn about using the Blink Commercial Incentives tool.
Funding Programs for EV Charging There are often funding opportunities for commercial property managers looking to install EVSE, like the U.S. federal government’s AlternativeFuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit. Not sure if your business qualifies for one of the federalprograms?
Some type of incentive program is available in 44 states and Washington, D.C. , on top of the federalprogram that’s offered everywhere in the US. They usually come in the form of a tax rebate to reduce your business’s tax bill, but they may come in other forms (as we’ll discuss later).
The rebates are primarily targeted at medium- and heavy-duty vehicles; of the funding allocated for rebates, not more than 25% is to be used to provide rebates to qualified owners for the purchase of qualified alternativefuel vehicles that have a gross vehicle rating of not more than 8,500 pounds.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content